USE CASEPersonalAdvanced

Teach a bot one analyst's valuation method, then just feed it tickers

MoneyorLifeX had Grok Bot study a finance YouTuber's price-target method, pull free data, and learn to assign P/E multiples - a 'valuation levels' agent that outputs a chart for any ticker. Two other investing agents critique its method. Honest about its one human variable: the multiple is the agent's own judgment.

How it runs

5 steps. Do them in order.

  1. 01**Learn the pattern.** Point the bot at the analyst's videos so it studies *how* they build a valuation - what inputs they use, how they reason to a price level.
  2. 02**Find the data.** Have it locate 4-5 free data sources for the fundamentals it needs (earnings, growth, multiples). This is where reality bites: in his run, forward EPS growth wasn't available from one free source, so the agent said so rather than faking it.
  3. 03**Learn the multiple.** The one genuinely subjective input is the P/E multiple. The agent forms its own judgment here - and he's explicit that this is the only human-style variable, and it drives the final number.
  4. 04**Write down the rules.** The agent summarizes its whole method in markdown, then two other investing agents read it and critique it in a three-way conversation - a self-review pass that hardens the methodology before it's trusted.
  5. 05**Then just feed it tickers.** Give it a symbol and it returns a valuation-levels chart (his examples: NVIDIA and McDonald's). Optionally it runs in the background and pings you when the live price crosses a key level.

What you get

Most "AI stock" prompts ask a model to guess a price and hope it sounds smart. This one is the opposite: it treats valuation as a *method to be learned and audited*, not an answer to be generated. Three design choices make it stand out. First, it learns a specific human's pattern rather than inventing its own - so the output is legible and traceable to a real approach. Second, the three-agent critique is a genuine self-review loop: the methodology gets stress-tested before you rely on it. Third, and most importantly, it's honest about its own limits - it names the free-data gaps out loud and flags the valuation multiple as the agent's judgment, the single human variable that swings the result. That honesty is what makes it a tool for *understanding* valuation quickly rather than a black box you're tempted to trust. Learn the method once, then a ticker is all it takes.

Prompt

Copy it. Change the names. Keep the job.

Prompt
You are Levels, my valuation-levels agent. Your job is to learn one analyst's method for setting stock price levels, then apply it to any ticker I give you.

SETUP - learn the method:
1. Study the source material I give you (an analyst's videos or writeups). Work out their pattern: what inputs they use and how they reason from those inputs to a price level. Do not copy numbers - learn the method.
2. Find 4-5 FREE data sources for the fundamentals the method needs (earnings, growth rates, valuation multiples). List them. If a required input is not freely available, say so explicitly and do not invent it.
3. The valuation multiple (e.g. P/E) is the one subjective input. Form and state your own judgment for it, and label it clearly as your assumption - it drives the final level, so I need to see it.
4. Summarize the full method and rules in markdown. Then critique it as if you were two other investors: where is it weak, what would you improve? Revise the rules accordingly.

USE - per ticker:
5. When I give you a symbol, apply the method and return a clear valuation-levels view: the key price levels, the assumptions behind them, and the source of each data point. Mark any input you couldn't get for free.
6. Optional: if I ask, run in the background and alert me when the live price crosses one of the key levels.

Rules: never present a level as a fact or a recommendation - it is a model output built on stated assumptions, one of which (the multiple) is your judgment. Always show the assumptions and the missing data. This is for understanding the valuation logic, not for deciding trades.
Use withGrok

via @money_or_life_x · Tweet by @Money_or_Life_X

Tips

  • ·Point the bot at the videos or writeups of an analyst whose method you want to learn. It needs web access for free data; expect gaps (forward EPS growth wasn't free in his run). The multiple is the agent's judgment, not fact - treat outputs as a way to understand the logic, not a buy signal.
  • ·adhoc
  • ·proposes

Related setups

Same category. Different job.

More in Personal

Built in 15 seconds, better than the paid tool

Gavin Baker built a podcast summarizer in about 15 seconds inside Grok Bot that beat the tool he was already paying for. Said his personal AI usage jumped ~100x. 5.7K likes / 5.2M views.

Personal·Moderate·0 saves
Setup

Give your Grok Bot a phone number - it makes the calls and reports back

Peter bought a $15 phone number on Bland, gave his Grok Bot the API key, and the bot worked out the rest. Now he asks it to call someone with instructions, it has the conversation and reports back - recording on request. It cloned his voice from a 10-second sample, and voicemails left on the number show up in the chat.

Personal·Simple·0 saves
Setup

One bot's only job: be the long-term memory of your house

Morgan Linton's idea for a bot no chatbot can be: photograph every appliance sticker, breaker panel, filter size and paint can once, and the bot files it all for years. A cheap monthly check flags expiring warranties and due filters - and when something breaks, one photo comes back as a one-page repair card.

Personal·Simple·0 saves
Setup

Give your bot specs and a max price - it bids when the bargain appears

Vox runs two real-money errands on one rule. A bargain tracker: exact specs, acceptable condition, max price - when a listing checks every box the bot buys or bids; over budget comes back as a link. And a haircut booked end to end, paid via Stripe Link. The rule: within range, go ahead; outside it, ask first.

Personal·Moderate·0 saves
Setup